O co chodzi w sprawie Google vs Apple vs RCS bardzo dobre wyjaśnienie tematu:
https://www.androidpolice.com/google-rc ... -imessage/
"
RCS isn’t a set standard, though. If Apple wasn’t made to support Universal Profile, it could develop its own in-house RCS platform to meet those requirements. Potentially one that doesn’t support the Universal Profile or talk to Google’s servers.
There’s one other big issue that Google needs to address, and it probably doesn’t want to. Right now, RCS on Android essentially means Google’s version of it. The causes are complicated, but the company cornered the RCS messaging market due to its position. Google saved us from carrier selfishness and dithering but tied us to its version.
That’s because RCS messaging needs to connect to a server to work, and Android doesn’t support RCS at a system level as it does for SMS. Any company hoping to spin up an RCS implementation needs the backend resources and a user-facing app to connect it to. Google has its Jibe servers and its Messaging app, but third-party developers can’t make apps that plug into that.
Google was rumored to open its Chat APIs, but that hasn’t panned out (it seems it was only for Samsung). Google never responded to our questions on whether it plans to open up those APIs for third-party apps."
Polecam przeczytać całość. Zwłaszcza wobec ostatnich wiadomosci że apple doda rcs według GSMA UP ale to nie znaczy google jibe rcs version.
https://www.techradar.com/phones/iphone ... cs-in-2024
Ale co to dokładnie będzie okaże się za rok, czy tylko p2p, a2p, czy rbm na jakich zasadach czy może intercomnect między serwerami Google JiBE i apple rcs. Ciekawe.